Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Performance Problem

Re: Performance Problem

From: Alex Gorbachev <ag_at_oracloid.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 23:48:14 -0500
Message-ID: <c2213f680711052048r2b150644s27e7859a112cba1f@mail.gmail.com>


Wolfgang,

It's been fixed in 10.2.0.3. See ML Note 391116.1.

Alex

On Nov 5, 2007 11:34 PM, Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw_at_centrexcc.com> wrote:
>
> Which bug is that? There may be several. E.g. bug 4604970 is listed as
> being fixed only in 11.1.0, updated just two days ago
>
>
> At 12:50 AM 11/5/2007, Nuno Souto wrote:
>
> Nearly missed this one.
> We're now on 10.2.0.3, after a bad experience with 10.2.0.2
> and .48.10 Peopletools.
> we still use _unnest_subquery for the darn date range subqueries
> in Peoplesoft but
> _gby_hash_aggregation_enabled is not
> needed in 10.2.0.3: the bug that caused that problem
> was fixed in this release. I have confirmed this
> with a query that caused the problem in 10.2.0.2 and
> it is indeed gone.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Wolfgang Breitling
> Centrex Consulting Corporation
> www.centrexcc.com

-- 
Alex Gorbachev, Oracle DBA Brewer, The Pythian Group
http://www.pythian.com/blogs/author/alex http://www.oracloid.com
BAAG party - www.BattleAgainstAnyGuess.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Nov 05 2007 - 22:48:14 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US