Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: all_objects: anyone know why Oracle decided to only make triggers viewable with "CREATE ANY TRIGGER" system priv?
Security. By default on the owner and DBA's can see trigger (and also
package body) source.
Triggers are often used for auditing. If you can see what the trigger does then you can write the DML to remove the generated trail.
There are ways to provide access to source code without granting DBA or ANY privileges. For developers we provide a modified version of the user_source view that we then grant select on.
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Charles Schultz
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 2:01 PM To: oracle-l Subject: all_objects: anyone know why Oracle decided to onlymake triggers viewable with "CREATE ANY TRIGGER" system priv?
While trying to figure out how to give our data modelers access to read any object, we came across this little caveat where they need "CREATE ANY TRIGGER" to see triggers in all_objects. Ironically, we can grant them "SELECT ANY DICTIONARY" and they can find the triggers from dba_objects, but since they are using a canned app that hardcodes all_objects, that was not happening.
But, why would you have to have a relatively powerful system privilege just to see triggers? The relevant part of all_objects is:
or ( o.type# in (12) /* trigger */ and exists (select null from v$enabledprivs where priv_number in ( -152 /* CREATE ANY TRIGGER */ ) ) ) What about priv_number 237 (SELECT ANY DICTIONARY)? Or any otherinnocuous priv?
In doing some research, I came across David Litchfield's paper on security:
http://securityvulns.com/files/ohh-indirect-privilege-escalation.pdf
Also, Pete Finigans: http://www.pentest.co.uk/documents/oracle-security.htm I appreciated Alex Gorbachev's take on the fiasco with SYS andauthid as well:
http://www.pythian.com/blogs/352/calling-definer-rights-procedure-as-sys dba-security-hole
I am sure the issue with all_objects has been addressed, but googling for specific information is like finding a needle in a haystack.
-- Charles Schultz
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Mon Oct 29 2007 - 16:02:48 CDT
![]() |
![]() |