Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Veritas Volume Replicator instead of DataGuard
CJE,
I'm sure Veritas will counter with:
Any other information?
Thanks for the input.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
On Behalf Of Carel-Jan Engel
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 2:59 PM
To: binhpham15_at_hotmail.com
Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Veritas Volume Replicator instead of DataGuard
Hi Binh,
In my opinion, there are numerous arguments to favour Data Guard over disk/san/volume replication. Just to mention a few:
Of course there are some arguments in favour of disk/san/volume replication as well:
I can't think of more right now, but maybe my mind is a little biased ;-)
HTH Best regards,
Carel-Jan Engel
===
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok)
===
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 14:52 -0700, Binh Pham wrote:
Any one who has used Veritas Volume Replicator in place of DataGuard for
disaster recovery or failover setups?
Any issues or problems? Pro's and con's?
Thanks.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Sep 12 2007 - 18:55:14 CDT