Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: EnterpriseDB as an Oracle replacement
We evaluated it a few months ago and found that the compatibility was
not great in several areas. In the case of PL/SQL stored procedures,
for example, they lacked support even for the most basic things that
we were looking for, such as:
Obviously this isn't the full and comprehensive list and, perhaps, you don't care about PL/SQL compatibility, but if you have other areas you are concerned about, shoot me an e-mail and I'll try to share what I can.
--Roby
On Sep 5, 2007, at 6:56 PM, Ben Poels wrote:
> I know many people have mentioned in the past that they find
> Postgres a
> viable alternative to Oracle for many uses. Now there is
> EnterpriseDb which
> is based on Postgres but takes it one step further and claims it is
> Oracle
> compatible. It even has range partitioning w/o the extra $$$. They are
> touting FTD, Vonage and Sony's gaming division as major users.
>
> Is anyone using EnterpriseDB for there non-critical databases to
> save money
> on licensing? If you are, how accurate are the compatibility
> claims? I know
> it doesn't support XMLTYPE and private synonyms for instance.
> Anyone done
> any benchmarks?
>
> Ben
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
/======================================================================= | Roby Sherman ( r x s h e r m @ i n t e r e a l m . c o m )| DBA, Architect, Computer Scientist, Pain in the keister
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- | http://www.robysherman.org |=======================================================================| A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without bricks tied to it's head
\=======================================================================
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Sep 05 2007 - 20:59:38 CDT