Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Concurrent io AIX 5.3
Pretty much correct. You will need to set init.ora param
filesystemio_options to be SETALL
There was a discussion recently on here about just this matter. Search
on AIX and CIO on the webpages and you will pick it up. It may have been
about 10g not 9i though and the setting of filesystemio_options changed.
remember the 4K is o/s size so a multiple of that will be OK for db block size
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Brian Shanblatt
Sent: 26 July 2007 06:08
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Concurrent io AIX 5.3
Hello all!
I am configuring a new AIX 5.3 machine, for an oracle database 9.2.0.8
The file systems are JFS2, with the blocksize of 4K which matches our db block size.
I would like to implement Concurrent io. I am looking for some advice/affirmation, beyond what I found on Metalink and IBM whitepapers.
What I would like to do is:
1) All datafiles (tables, indexes, UNDO tablespace, etc) would be on
JFS2
mounted with cio, with a block size of 4K
2) Redo logs would be on JFS2, mounted with cio, with block size of
(agblksize) of 512 BYTES. (is this because oracle writes redos in 512
byte pieces?)
3) Control files would be on on JFS2 file systems, mounted as default
(not
using direct io or concurrent io).
Does this makes sense? I am assuming that control files should not be on filesystems with cio, though I found some conflicted data about control files.
I would appreciate any advice/affirmations/flames!
Thank you!
-brian s
analyst/dba
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Jul 26 2007 - 07:43:57 CDT
![]() |
![]() |