Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> SV: bitand functions and NUMBER(20)
Hi Stefan
I think the bitand is limited to 2**63 - in SQL Developer:
select bitand(10846370260800065548,9368617832122679304) from dual;
select power(2,63) from dual;
BITAND(10846370260800065548,9368617832122679304)
1 rows selected
POWER(2,63)
1 rows selected
Something to do with bitand (still) returning a binary integer (or something
other than a NUMBER) - see for example
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/bitwise.html.
HTH
Michael Garfield Sørensen, CeDeT
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] På
vegne af Stefan Kuhn
Sendt: 19. juli 2007 15:47
Til: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Emne: Re: bitand functions and NUMBER(20)
On Thursday 19 July 2007 15:30, Mark W. Farnham wrote:
> I'm curious how you're establishing the value that Oracle is returning.
Hm, I assumed that 9.2234E+18 is different from 9368617832122679304, which
would be 9.3686E+18. I also used Tora for the query, and it displays
9223372036854775807.
Stefan
>
> This could possibly just be a problem with the column format not being
wide
> enough for a fully expressed displayed answer.
>
> Regards,
>
> mwf
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
> On Behalf Of Stefan Kuhn
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 8:18 AM
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: bitand functions and NUMBER(20)
>
> Hi all,
> I have got a column defined as NUMBER(20) and want to use bit functions on
> it.
> It seems that oracle bitand function is restricted in length. To give an
> example:
> select bitand(10846370260800065548,9368617832122679304) from TABLE;
> returns 9.2234E+18, although the second figure is a subset of bits in
first
> figure. So result should be 9368617832122679304.
> To make sure my figures are right, I did
> select 10846370260800065548 & 9368617832122679304;
> in Mysql and it gave 9368617832122679304.
> The problem does arise with figures of a certain length.
> What to do best (apart from changing the column type, which I would like
to
> avoid)?
> I hope the question isn't too trivia...
> Stefan
-- Stefan Kuhn BSc MA IPB Halle AG Bioinformatik & Massenspektrometrie Weinberg 3 06120 Halle http://www.ipb-halle.de http://msbi.bic-gh.de skuhn_at_ipb-halle.de Tel. +49 (0) 345 5582 1474 Fax.+49 (0) 345 5582 1409 -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.9/907 - Release Date: 18-07-2007 15:30 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.9/907 - Release Date: 18-07-2007 15:30 -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Jul 19 2007 - 15:11:50 CDT
![]() |
![]() |