Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: tunning an index build
Oops. Thank you. I have corrected that. I'll check and see if there is any
improvement
thank you so much
Gene Gurevich
"Alexander Fatkulin" <afatkulin_at_gmail. To com> "genegurevich_at_discover.com" Sent by: <genegurevich_at_discover.com> oracle-l-bounce_at_f cc reelists.org oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject Re: tunning an index build 07/18/2007 11:20 AM Please respond to afatkulin_at_gmail.c om
No,
the pga_aggreagte_target is *only* relevant if you have workarea_size_policy=auto.
What you have done is used the defaults for *_area_size which are quite small.
On 7/18/07, genegurevich_at_discover.com <genegurevich_at_discover.com> wrote:
> Alex,
>
> Yes, I have set pga_aggregate_target to 1.5G and workarea_size_policy is
> manual. I thought that this will make
> the sort_area_size (and all other area_size parameters) unused. IS that
not
> the case?
> I am also working with the UNIX team to address the I/O contention that I
> am seeing.
>
> thank you for your input
>
>
>
> Gene Gurevich
-- Alex Fatkulin, The Pythian Group, http://www.pythian.com/blogs/author/alexf/ -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Jul 18 2007 - 17:45:38 CDT
![]() |
![]() |