Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Understanding Gets, Pins and Reloads - V$librarycache, consideration of evil
That depends on your moral matrix. For me, I consider the useless generation
of entropy to be evil. Since brain cells firing use energy, thinking about
hit ratios generates entropy. Since hit ratios don't amuse me as a puzzle or
serve any other intellectually pleasing function and since they serve no
practical purpose, I suppose for me consideration of hit ratios is indeed
evil.
If hit ratios were at least as indicative that something needs attention as an oil pressure light (rather than a gauge) you might look at them. But since assembling the required other information to tell whether the hit ratios mean anything provides more information than the hit ratios themselves and since the hit ratios themselves add no value to the required contextual data to interpret them I find them entirely useless.
Now the debate about whether the "first inquiry" should be counted as a hit, a miss, or nothing in formulating the hit ratio equation is mildly entertaining, but since it devolves to the semantic definition of a useless metric that leaves me flat as well.
So, yes, at least small "e" evil.
The direct questions are:
Regards,
mwf
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
On Behalf Of Ram Raman
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 10:16 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Understanding Gets, Pins and Reloads - V$librarycache
<snip>
I take it using cache hit ratios are not all that evil?
<snip>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed May 16 2007 - 10:45:46 CDT
![]() |
![]() |