Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: RMAN Recovery
My opinion is that the ETL programmer should not be running any script
or any command on a database server machine. He/she should not even
have an account on the machine.
Again, a database failure because of "operator error". Nothing to do with the software itself.
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jason Heinrich
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 4:51 PM
To: RWeiss_at_safmt.org; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: RMAN Recovery
Funny, I just read an AskTom post yesterday where he recommended against naming your redo logs with the .log extension for this very reason.
On 5/3/07 3:01 PM, Rick Weiss wrote:
Thanks to all for the help -the FM gave me the quickest work-around:
RESTORE DATABASE DEVICE TYPE DISK; I will check the SHOW ALL output and set the configuration to use disk as the default, but I am in the middle of the restore process right now. The cause of my problem was an erroneous rm *.log that whacked all the redologs by an analyst trying to clean out a bunch of Oracle Warehouse Builder ETL log files.
Thanks for all of your fine responses, as usual ORACLE-L is the best.
Rick Weiss
Oracle Database Administrator
Student Assistance Foundation
P.O.Box 203101
2500 Broadway
Helena, MT 59620-3101
rweiss_at_safmt.org
(406) 495-7356
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri May 04 2007 - 06:38:10 CDT
![]() |
![]() |