| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
 |
 | |||
| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
|
| |||
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: 10.2.0.3
I think I found the one you were talking about -
Doc ID: Note:412271.1 Subject: ORA-600 [22635] and ORA-600 [KOKEIIX1] Reported WhileUpgrading Or Patching Databases To 10.2.0.3
Now it occurs to me that I'd already seen this one before - this is the same issue I had provided as an example a few weeks ago in the discussion of upgrade via dbua vs. exp/imp.
Please let us know if there are any other issues you were referring to specifically with 32-bit > 64-bit 10.2.0.3 upgrades.
Thanks,
Brandon
-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Brandon
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 10:56 AM
To: 'mcdonald.connor_at_gmail.com'; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: 10.2.0.3
Thanks for the heads-up Connor, but could you please provide more detail? I searched Metalink and checked the note for 10.2.0.3 Alerts & Known Issues (401435.1), but I couldn't find anything about 10.2.0.3 upgrades and 32>64-bit migration. I'm planning on just such an upgrade very soon so I'm very concerned about any potential issues. Could you please provide the relevant bug, patch or note numbers?
Thanks,
Brandon
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Connor McDonald
There's been a fair bit of press about 10.2.0.3 upgrade going belly up when going to 32 to 64bit.
There's patches now for this problem on metalink.
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Mar 29 2007 - 13:26:36 CDT
 |
 |