Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Sun T2000

Re: Sun T2000

From: Alexander Fatkulin <afatkulin_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:01:58 +1100
Message-ID: <49d668000703242101x14627a3l4a9022c9907f730b@mail.gmail.com>


Kevin,

thanks for the question. There were no PIO involved.

Here is what I see:

create table t as

	select mod(level, 10) m10,
			mod(level, 25) m25,
			mod(level, 50) m50,
			level l
		from dual
		connect by level <= 500000;

Proliant results:

select m10, m25, m50, sum(l), count(*), min(l), max(l), avg(l)  from t
 group by m10, m25, m50

call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          1          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        5      0.69       0.67          0        649          0          50
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
total        7      0.69       0.67          0        650          0          50

T2000 results:

select m10, m25, m50, sum(l), count(*), min(l), max(l), avg(l)  from t
 group by m10, m25, m50

call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        2      4.45       4.34          0        649          0          50
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
total        4      4.45       4.34          0        649          0          50

Both DB were created with a 16K blocksize. And mind that - Proliant were running with use_indirect_data_buffers=true.

On 3/25/07, Kevin Closson <kevinc_at_polyserve.com> wrote:
> of the T2000 server
> vs Proliant DL380 G3 (based on 3Ghz Xeons).
>
> One Niagara core were approximately 7 to 8 times slower than single
> Xeon CPU in batch task (huge sorts/aggregates) -
>
> ...I'm not syaing you didn't see this result, but that seem slower than
> expected. To what degree was I/O a factor?
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Alexander Fatkulin
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Sat Mar 24 2007 - 23:01:58 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US