Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Auto Extend On, Increment By
I don't see the big downside of having autoextend on (except for temp
tablespaces - those things can become a monster with a bad piece of
code). At our shop, we use nagios to monitor the file systems. This
helps prevent us from running out of space in the file system without
having a tablespace fill up with a job in the middle of the night that I
wasn't told was going to run. (kind of like having a GPS ankle bracelet
on your teenager - right Tim?)
That said - I believe in monitoring to make sure that my space assumptions continue to be correct. If circumstances change because of a release of code or a change in the business model, then I can decide if I need to change my storage strategy.
Steve Smith
Desk: 303-231-5499
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Dennis Williams
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 6:00 PM
To: Joel.Patterson_at_crowley.com
Cc: Oracle-L_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Auto Extend On, Increment By
Joel,
If you decide to switch to autoextend, I think this is the least issue to decide. The important issue is how space will be monitored. Done right, autoextend can give you a single space indicator to monitor. But make sure none of your tables have a limit of extents or you'll get a failure even though you still have disk space.
Dennis Williams
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Mar 16 2007 - 10:09:59 CDT
![]() |
![]() |