Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: incremental backups
No noticeable impact that I've seen, but I haven't really looked for
one. I would think you'll want your change tracking file on a fast
disk(s), just like redo logs, to prevent waits on the I/Os.
Here's what the docs say about it:
From
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/backup.102/b14192/bkup
004.htm#i1032148
"Change tracking is disabled by default, because it does introduce some minimal performance overhead on your database during normal operations. However, the benefits of avoiding full datafile scans during backup are considerable, especially if only a small percentage of data blocks are changed between backups. If your backup strategy involves incremental backups, then you should enable change tracking."
Here are my backup sizes and times through 3 channels to Netbackup for L0 (full) incremental:
Database BS_Key Start End Minutes Backup Type Status #Files Database Size MB Written Size MB
And then for L1 with change tracking file:
Database BS_Key Start End Minutes Backup Type Status #Files Database Size MB Written Size MB
Regards,
Brandon
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Manmohan Jalsingh
Any idea on performance impact on database by using block change tracking feature.
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Mar 07 2007 - 16:00:15 CST
![]() |
![]() |