Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: RAC ASM question
Thanks Rajeev and yes I had checked that very good paper. I know it has recommended that we should have only two DG for RACor Signle Instance like for DB file and one for FlashRecovey Area but the paper was written in 2004 with 10g Release 1 and so there might be any such recommendation for 10g Rel 2 or so.
Tx
Sanjay
Rajeev Prabhakar <rprabha01_at_gmail.com> wrote:
Sanjay,
If you haven't already, you may want to go through the ASM best practices whitepaper.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/asm/pdf/asm_bestpractices_9_7.pdf
-Rajeev
On 3/5/07, Sanjay Mishra <smishra_97_at_yahoo.com> wrote: Thanks Salem. Is there any benchmark or result or best practices that says that don't create more than x number of DG.
Sanjay
Ghassan Salem <salem.ghassan_at_gmail.com> wrote:
Sanjay,
You can do it either way. The right way depends on your disks and disk layout. If you'll end up with the same disks in different diskgroups, I do not see the utility of using several ones. Having one DG allows for better spread of I/O. Having several DGs allows for more control on when to use redundancy (depending on app requirement, ...) It's better to have a DG for FRA, as it's usage and redundancy req are different than 'normal' data. rgds
On 3/3/07, Sanjay Mishra <smishra_97_at_yahoo.com > wrote: Hi
I am building a RAC environment which will host 3 Application Database. I am planning to create 4 Oracle Home like one for each Database and 4th one for ASM. This way I can patch any one without affecting others.
TIA
Sanjay
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Mar 06 2007 - 08:45:47 CST
![]() |
![]() |