Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Issues with Oracle 10.2.0.3 upgrade on Solaris
Did you apply the mandatory patch 5752399 for 10.2.0.3 on Solaris 64-bit
and Filesystems Managed by Veritas or Solstice Disk Suite software? I
just applied the patchset 10.2.0.3 this weekend but I also applied this
mandatory patch. Without the manadatory patch I couldn't even start up
my databases. I am not seeing any issues after my patch maintenance on
Saturday. We had applied the patchset and the mandatory patch on our
Dev/Test server prior to applying them on the production system for
about a month. Of course, I am not running on a RAC platform and I am
not sure that this patch applies for RAC or whether there is another
patch that does. The Metalink Doc ID for this patch is 406472.1.
Sandra Arnold
Sr. Database Administrator
DOE/OSTI
Oak Ridge, TN
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of daniel koehne
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 3:12 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Issues with Oracle 10.2.0.3 upgrade on Solaris
Primary DB Configuration: a 2 node RAC cluster
Solaris: 5.9 Generic_118558-25 sun4u sparc SUNW,Netra-T12
Oracle: 10.2.0.3 RAC
Veritas Cluster: Symantec/Veritas Storage Foundation for Oracle RAC
4.1 MP1 (VERITAS-4.1_p3.1:2005-10-24)
Databases: MDB and RPMP
This past Sunday we upgraded this RAC system from 10.2.0.3 to 10.2.0.3 and am now experiencing a world of hurt. Here is list of the major problems we are experiencing:
We have a Sev 1 Metalink service request but are not making much progress. So I am wondering if anyone else has experienced these problems after upgrading to Oracle 10.2.0.3 on Solaris?
And as an aside we did test the 10.2.0.3 upgrade in our integration environment and had no problems/issues.
Thanks for any help
Daniel
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Feb 27 2007 - 15:44:11 CST
![]() |
![]() |