Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: SIEBEL PERFORMANCE RBO to CBO
Hi,
The mutex stuff was discussed on this forum last year http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/04-2006/msg01150.html
Thanks
Fairlie
LS Cheng <exriscer_at_gmail.com> wrote:
Not sure what does mutex do, if someone can explain...
I have seen a place where _kks_use_mutex_pin was set to FALSE to reduce compilation time because 100% of application was written in PL/SQL packages and compiling was a nightmare for them after moving from 9i to 10g, compilation elapsed time contention was around 400% higher due to library cache latching. It was z/OS.
On 2/5/07, Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote: Idle thought about HP-UX being the only case where you see CURSOR: PIN S WAIT ON X
I believe the HP chip does not have a compare and swap operation - which Oracle uses for sharable read latches on most platforms. I would guess that the mutex mechanism uses the same chip feature. Presumably the CAS emulation that Oracle does on HP-UX works okay for sharable latches, but has a greater impact on the visibility of mutex operations.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
Author: Cost Based Oracle: Fundamentals
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/cbo_book/ind_book.html
The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Fairlie Rego Senior Oracle Consultant http://www.linkedin.com/in/fairlierego http://el-caro.blogspot.com/ M: +61 402 792 405 --------------------------------- We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Mon Feb 05 2007 - 16:33:45 CST
![]() |
![]() |