Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Objects in KEEP pool question

RE: Objects in KEEP pool question

From: Bobak, Mark <Mark.Bobak_at_il.proquest.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:07:54 -0500
Message-ID: <AA29A27627F842409E1D18FB19CDCF270ADB674D@AABO-EXCHANGE02.bos.il.pqe>


The blocks age out, they do not overflow into the default pool.  

-Mark  

--

Mark J. Bobak

Senior Oracle Architect

ProQuest Information & Learning

There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which shouldn't be done at all. -Peter F. Drucker, 1909-2005  


From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Binh Pham Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 3:26 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Objects in KEEP pool question

If the KEEP pool is not large enough, whap happens to the blocks from objects that are supposed to go to the KEEP pool when KEEP pool is full? Does Oracle flush out existing blocks in the KEEP pool for the new blocks or the overflows go to the DEFAULT pool?  


Dave vs. Carl: The Insignificant Championship Series. Who will win? <http://g.msn.com/8HMAENUS/2737??PS=47575> -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Tue Jan 09 2007 - 15:07:54 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US