Re: RAC Interconnect

From: Alex Gorbachev <gorbyx_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:19:36 -0500
Message-ID: <c2213f680611241819uaf81bcsf79f1df69f69c9b3@mail.gmail.com>

Veritas support - well it varies. At the site I used to work, we've got down to backline engineering and there are really brilliant technical people working. However, particularly sluggish is support for Oracle 10g and Oracle itself is not very keen on Veritas to say the least. IMHO.

Regarding LLT,
I tested LLT in another aspect - evaluating CPU consumption compare to UDP (running Oracle of course). Surprisingly, it wasn't any lower with LLT whereas I thought that eliminating "expensive" IP stack should definitely reduce CPU consumption.

On 11/24/06, Hameed, Amir <Amir.Hameed_at_xerox.com> wrote:
> Gopal,
> We have a very close relationship with VOS and I have always found the
> Veritas side of VOS extremely competent and technically very sound. We are
> not currently running RAC (and there is a long story behind it) but if we
> run into any issues with LLT in the future, I have good faith that Veritas
> will resolve the issue for us.

-- 
Best regards,
Alex Gorbachev

The Pythian Group
Sr. Oracle DBA

http://www.pythian.com/blogs/author/alex/
http://blog.oracloid.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Fri Nov 24 2006 - 20:19:36 CST