Amir,
With LLT, when you have an issue with performance/node evictions you will be asked to reproduce the problem without LLT (i.e UDP) and you may not able to file bugs/enhancements with LLT. Contact me offline if you need more details on this .
RacDBAs... Do you guys have any details for wider audience?
-Gopal
Author: Oracle Database 10g RAC Handbook, Oracle Press 2006
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/007146509X/
----- Original Message ----
From: "Hameed, Amir" <Amir.Hameed@xerox.com>
To: panandrao@gmail.com; ax.mount@gmail.com
Cc: oracle-l@freelists.org
Sent: Thursday, 23 November, 2006 10:08:03 PM
Subject: RE: RAC Interconnect
Hello,
I have worked with LLT for over two years with DBE/AC 3.5 for 9i RAC and found no issues what-so-ever with it (LLT). It is a very reliable protocol, proprietary though, but reliable. The LMX driver does the multiplexing and de-multiplexing for LLT, so if you are using multiple interconnects, your traffic will be load-balanced without you doing/configuring anything special. I have not really seen any clear statement from Oracle for de-supporting LLT in the future even though they have been emphasizing on using UDP, which is very typical of Oracle.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Nov 24 2006 - 00:54:24 CST
