RE: Julian Dyke's RAC book

From: <oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:24:44 -0800
Message-ID: <5D2570CAFC98974F9B6A759D1C74BAD001C33506@ex2.ms.polyserve.com>

Until Lars Mabrowksy says otherwise, I think I'd stick with three nodes...nobody has more at stake in the success of Open Source clustered filesystems than the folks in Lars' group... they really, really need the idea to stick. That's what they do for a living.

Moral of the Story: Fencing should never be an afterthought when making a cluster filesystem.

>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Best, David [mailto:David.Best_at_cognos.com]
>>>Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 2:06 PM
>>>To: kevinc_at_polyserve.com; mgogala_at_verizon.net; gorbyx_at_gmail.com
>>>Cc: oracle-l
>>>Subject: RE: Julian Dyke's RAC book
>>>
>>>RE: OCFS2 needs 3 nodes.
>>>
>>>Hey all, is this still an issue? From the thread on the
>>>SuSE mailing list quoted in Kevin's blog one person
>>>commented that it's a configuration problem.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Mon Nov 20 2006 - 16:24:44 CST