Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Reasons for not considering Logical Standby Databases for Reporting purposes

Re: Reasons for not considering Logical Standby Databases for Reporting purposes

From: Ron Warshawsky <ronwarshawsky_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 15:08:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20061103230853.17270.qmail@web30615.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

 

  Hello Anurag,    

    Prior to 10GR2 many things can go wrong with logical standby. R2 is more stable, but still it is not rock solid. If your budget allows you may consider Shareplex - it is robust and much easier to diagnose.    

  Regards,    

    Ron Warshawsky   

Anurag Verma <anuragdba_at_gmail.com> wrote:

    Hello friends,
  We are thinking of setting up a Standby database for reporting purposes during the business hours and after that apply the pending logs.   We are considering various options of multiple physical standby databases, cascaded redo log destinations and logical standby databases.   Today, I was reading the Logical standby databases and their advantages.   Have any of you guys thought about Logical standby databases while designing a standby database where it can be used for reporting purposes.   

I want to know what are the reasons or disadvantages of Logical standby databases that prompted you for NOT TAKING Logical standby databases for such a design.   

If you can give me some inputs, it would be really great...   Thanks in advance,
   Anurag

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Nov 03 2006 - 17:08:53 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US