Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE : RE: Query takes ages in Oracle 10G
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 584 0.86 1.85 0 0 2 0 Execute 1510 2.12 4.10 94 64 226 28 Fetch 3353 672.75 1349.55 10158 4238323 1 5223Misses in library cache during parse: 97 Misses in library cache during execute: 86
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 5447 675.73 1355.51 10252 4238387 229 5251
173 user SQL statements in session. 1265 internal SQL statements in session. 1438 SQL statements in session.
0 statements EXPLAINed in this session.
1 session in tracefile. 173 user SQL statements in trace file.1265 internal SQL statements in trace file. 1438 SQL statements in trace file.
"Reidy, Ron" <Ron.Reidy_at_arraybiopharma.com> a écrit :
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} What wait event(s) were shown in your trace file?
---------------------------------
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Isabel Bedoya
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 3:13 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Query takes ages in Oracle 10G
Hi all,
I am trying to run a query with sub-queries in Oracle 10G Release 2 and it is taking ages, I divided the query into parts and I have no problems running the first and third subqueries (together and each one separated) but when I try to run the second subquery along with the other two or just itself, it takes ages (I generated a trace and returned a wait of 22 minutes executing the query giving no results at all). The table has 22567 records in it and runs PERFECTLY in Oracle 9i, we didn't change anything while migrating to 10G. It seems there is a problem with the date being invoked in the second subquery. Do you have any clue about what can be happening with this query?. Thanks
SELECT *
FROM TITULO
WHERE TITULO_ESCENA_CODIGO___ = 'REAL' AND TITULO_PORTAF_CODIGO___ = 'OBL' AND TITULO_TIPTIT_CODIGO___ = 'TES_TF' AND (TITULO_INDTITGAR IS NULL OR TITULO_INDTITGAR = 4) AND TITULO_FUTURO___ IS NULL AND TITULO_ESTADO___ = 2 AND TITULO_CLASIFICA <> 3 AND TITULO_NUMERO___ NOT IN (SELECT OPETIT_TITULO_NUMERO___ FROM OPETIT, OPERAC WHERE OPETIT_ESCENA_CODIGO____OPE = 'REAL' AND OPETIT_PORTAF_CODIGO____OPE = 'OBL' AND OPETIT_OPERAC_NUMERO___ = OPERAC_NUMERO___ AND OPERAC_ESCENA_CODIGO___ = 'REAL' AND OPERAC_PORTAF_CODIGO___ = 'OBL' AND OPERAC_TIPOPE_CODIGO___ = 2 AND OPERAC_ESTADO___ IN (2, 3)) AND TITULO_NUMERO___ NOT IN (SELECT VENCIM_TITULO_NUMERO___ FROM VENCIM WHERE VENCIM_ESCENA_CODIGO___ = 'REAL' AND VENCIM_PORTAF_CODIGO___ = 'OBL' AND VENCIM_ESTADO___ = 2 AND VENCIM_FECCOBORI <= '21/09/2006') AND TITULO_NUMERO___ NOT IN (SELECT T_TITU.TITULO_NUMERO___ FROM T_TITU, T_OPTI WHERE T_TITU.TITULO_ESCENA_CODIGO___ = 'REAL' AND T_TITU.TITULO_PORTAF_CODIGO___ = 'OBL' AND T_TITU.TITULO_NUMERO___ = OPETIT_TITULO_NUMERO___ AND OPETIT_ESCENA_CODIGO____OPE = 'REAL' AND OPETIT_PORTAF_CODIGO____OPE = 'OBL' AND OPETIT_OPERAC_NUMERO___ = 58)
---------------------------------
Lèche-vitrine ou lèche-écran ? Yahoo! Magasinage.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Sep 21 2006 - 16:31:42 CDT
![]() |
![]() |