Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?

RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?

From: Kevin Closson <kevinc_at_polyserve.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:53:15 -0700
Message-ID: <5D2570CAFC98974F9B6A759D1C74BAD0E5B0A6@ex2.ms.polyserve.com>

 

...ok, I want to steer this yet again onto a different runway if I may. What if, just consider for a moment, that you could create a filesystem (CFS) snapshot with no interruption every 2 seconds ( yes, I'm talking about filesystem COW snapshots to the tune of well over 100,000 supported per filesystem) throughout an entire production day and pick any of those to be the new read/write filesystem and expire

all others in one fell swoop?

>>back from DR DC to main DC, whilst the rest is replicating from main
DC to DR DC? How easy is that? Can the DBA initiate that him/herself, or is there the need of getting Storage Admins and/or System Admins involved? I dislike dependencies like that.

...yes, DR that requires both storage admins and DBAs is very distastefull
to me as well...

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Sep 19 2006 - 16:53:15 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US