RE: Hitachi 9000 (was RE: 2GB or not 2GB )

From: Jesse, Rich <Rich.Jesse_at_qg.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:19:18 -0500
Message-ID: <FB5D3CCFCECC2948B5DCF4CABDBE6697A521A8@QTEX1.qg.com>

Lack of confidence in Linux drivers for 2/4GB HBAs was one of the reasons we went with AIX for our p5 blades. There's that whole "trail blazing" thing that some folks just don't want to do with their production ERP systems, but maybe that's just me... :)

Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Closson Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 3:12 PM To: oracle-l
Subject: RE: Hitachi 9000 (was RE: 2GB or not 2GB )

>>>

>>>Ooops, now I have egg on my face. I meant to say 100 GB in
>>>15 minutes, not 100 MB. That still seems awfully slow, but
>>>100 MB in 15 minutes would be awful.

That is 113MB/s. You wouldn't happen to have 1Gb HBAs would you? Is this data striped across, say, 10 spindles?

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Mon Sep 11 2006 - 15:19:18 CDT