RE: Primary Keys optional?

From: Jesse, Rich <Rich.Jesse_at_qg.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:34:38 -0500
Message-ID: <FB5D3CCFCECC2948B5DCF4CABDBE6697A5209B@QTEX1.qg.com>

Most humble apologies -- probably some VMS/RMS terms of a past life blending with the relational ones. I should have said "compound key", "composite key", or "concatenated key".

I sit corrected. :)

Rich

From: Niall Litchfield [mailto:niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 12:32 AM
To: Jesse, Rich
Cc: jkstill_at_gmail.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: Primary Keys optional?

segmented key? Not a term I've seen before.

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info 

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Mon Aug 21 2006 - 08:34:38 CDT