RE: 10.2.0.2 EE RAC, RHEL4 and LVM2 support?

From: Kevin Closson <kevinc_at_polyserve.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:55:53 -0700
Message-ID: <5D2570CAFC98974F9B6A759D1C74BAD0E5AB4D@ex2.ms.polyserve.com>

Oops, I meant to say they may have added one, but they spent years arguing that the central lock manager was better than distributed. They just echo Veritas on that since theirs is central.

Still, the Metalink note says what it says

>>>>>>
>>>>>>Doesn't the newer version of GFS implement a distributed
>>>>>>lock manager mechanism?
>>>>>>
>>>--
>>>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>>>
>>>
>>>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Mon Jul 24 2006 - 11:55:53 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jesse, Rich: "How to "concat" row values into a single column?"
Previous message: Yechiel Adar: "Re: FW: batch file scripting"
In reply to: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org: "RE: 10.2.0.2 EE RAC, RHEL4 and LVM2 support?"
Next in thread: Mladen Gogala: "Re: 10.2.0.2 EE RAC, RHEL4 and LVM2 support?"
Reply: Mladen Gogala: "Re: 10.2.0.2 EE RAC, RHEL4 and LVM2 support?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US