Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Is it possible to reorganize tables for logical standby while maintain the synchronization?
An alternative would be to use DBMS_REDEFINITION to recreate tables in a new
tablespace.
The downtime to switch to the new table is minimal.
A Caveat here:I haven't actually used DBMS_REDEFINITION for this. I have
done it manually
using materialized views on prebuilt tables, which I believe is the
mechanism underlying
DBMS_REDEFINITION.
DBMS_REDEFINITION was buggy on the Oracle version I had to do this on, hence
the manual
process. Great learning experience. :)
There is one requirement for doing this: Your table must either have a
primary key, or it must
have column(s) upon which you can temorarily build a PK. Some systems (such
as SAP) do
not use PK in the database, but they can be easily added and dropped.
Jared
On 6/27/06, qihua wu <wqhhp_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Our production database is of version 9.2 but still using DMT because it
> is upgraded from 8174. And we want to move the table to a LMT tablespace,
> althougth we can use some oracle package to convert DMT to LMT, but it's not
> perfect as TOM pointed. We can reorg these tables while the database is
> online, but the performance will be adversely effected.
>
> So is it possible to create a logical standy based on the production
> database, and then reorg the logical standby, after the reorg is done, then
> switch the role of the standby to primary database? As far as I know, the
> logical standy use sql appying instead of redo applying, so the transaction
> should be able to applied to logical standby while the reorg is under going.
>
> ------------------------------
> Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=40762/*http://www.yahoo.com/preview>.
> It's not radically different. Just radically better.
>
>
-- Jared Still Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Jun 28 2006 - 10:50:23 CDT
![]() |
![]() |