Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables

RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables

From: Laimutis Nedzinskas <Laimutis.Nedzinskas_at_landsbanki.is>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:15:24 -0000
Message-ID: <5A8896FB2AFC5445A7DCFC5903CCA6B02CA2B0@W03856.li01r1d.lais.net>


>From: Mladen Gogala
>Laimutis, you may want to take a look at my website
(http://www.mgogala.com).

That one http://www.mgogala.com/Manipulating_CBO.pdf is good.

In memorum:

This article explains why I have moved from development to dba. I betrayed, I left the other developers to deal with this craziness of reinventing a wheel 10^n'th of time.
I left them to deal with those vendors who in their hastiness to build and sell yet another product version forgot what essential features the previous version had.
Crazy, crazy software world.

PS:
Regarding "Therefore, I find recommending the parameter based "silver bullet" approach most effective and the
easiest to implement":
Yes, for a well tuned system I was setting those parameters just to index_cost=0, caching=100. Rude, but works for tuned applications. However, this approach does not work at all for "a man must not have to think" applications. This is where CBO unleashes its power.

Fyrirvari/Disclaimer
http://www.landsbanki.is/disclaimer

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Jun 28 2006 - 11:15:24 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US