RE: DBAs:Databases 1:10 (Oracle) 1:31 (SQL Server)

As a SQL server and oracle DBA, the concept of schema's was introduced in SQL Server 2005. I was just at a class where they said that they want to make SQL Server more "oracle like"

ciao,
Brian  

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Grant Allen Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:33 AM
To: Oracle-L_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: DBAs:Databases 1:10 (Oracle) 1:31 (SQL Server)

Gene Sais wrote:
> What Oracle calls a database is different from what SQLserver calls a
> database. SQLserver databases are equivalent to Oracle schema's.

Bzzzzt! Wrong (and not just you Gene - sorry to single you out). This has not been the case for nearly a decade! It makes me laugh every time

someone states this, especially as I have no love for the M$ product. SQL Server has *exactly* the same schema support as Oracle *as well as* support for multiple databases hosted by a given instance. A more accurate way of thinking of databases in SQL Server is as another namespace level above schemas.

To keep this vaguely on topic, I wonder if the "number of databases" count for SQL Server is artificially boosted by the fact that for every instance a DBA manages, they can claim to be managing 5 or 6 databases for nothing - master, msdb, tempdb, pubs/northwind/adventureworks.

Ciao
Fuzzy
:-)

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l