>>>From a few responses I have I think people are confusing
>>>what I am actually saying. I am not expecting UFS to be as
>>>fast as SAN. However I am expecting 9i to be the same as 10g
>>>on UFS and that is not what I am seeing. I am looking at 10g
>>>being twice as slow as 9i in the scenario
There is nothing wrong with your test case. I question what the
default OSD behaviour is for direct and async IO on UFS when
comparing 9i to 10g? Could it be that 9i on UFS is not doing direct I/O
and 10g is? Orders of magnitude comparisons are generally memory
vs disk comparisons, right ?
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Jun 08 2006 - 11:52:07 CDT
