Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: TimesTen

Re: TimesTen

From: Ghassan Salem <salem.ghassan_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 21:55:20 +0200
Message-ID: <411d50f60605251255k31055a98s3c43b8b4de1951a8@mail.gmail.com>


In TimesTen, you have much finer control over commits. When you create a db, you can specify 'durable commits=true', which means that every commit insures that redolog is written to disk. You can put it to false, and the redolog is written asynchronuously from the commit. But you can issue a redolog sync from your program whenever you want.

rgds

On 5/25/06, rjamya <rjamya_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> they claim, yes, it has concepts similar to redologs. We were going to
> do a test implementation, but it fell back due to various reasons. We
> still might do it in the near future to test it out.
>
> Raj
>
> On 5/25/06, Dennis Williams <oracledba.williams_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Tom,
> >
> > I'd be curious what is their recovery model. Can they guarantee that
> every
> > committed transaction is recoverable?
> >
> >
> > Dennis Williams
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu May 25 2006 - 14:55:20 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US