Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: How to check if index was updated?
my developers do, because they are designing a new application and
almost all code will use this new syntax to update thw whole row at a
time, albit only some columns may have been modified in a row.
Since they are assuming that about 90+% the indexes columns may not get updated, would it be wise to use this syntax if it will cause index operations that are completely un-necessary? Mind you, these guys sometimes write queries that *must* return within 400ms, so fast operation is the first priority.
I want ot find out if there is an easy way other than dumping blocks or logfiles that my developers can also test.
I am trying to find syntax to use bbed to show the dump, hopefully that would be prettier than blockdump.
Raj
On 4/26/06, Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> *easiest* way, trace it and look at the recursive sql.
> or you could dump the relevant index blocks to disk before and after.
>
> Me, I probably wouldn't care.
>
> On 4/26/06, rjamya <rjamya_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Got a query from my developers, they are trying to use the
> > "update xxx set row " syntax to modify a row using a record.
> >
> > How would I verify that pk index will not get updated if only non
> > indexed columns were changed in the record?
> >
> > is there an easy way? btw this is on 10104.
> >
> > TIA
> > Rjamya
> > ----------------------------------------------
> > Got RAC?
> > --
> > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> http://www.orawin.info
>
-- ---------------------------------------------- Got RAC? -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Apr 27 2006 - 06:13:09 CDT
![]() |
![]() |