Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: two databases in a server
Alex,
This is funny. What you call extreme I call normal. I have an IBM AIX
p570 as a development machine with 15 Oracle databases on it. And a
P690 with twice that. Right now they all share the same Oracle home
(although we are finally applying the January security patches using a
new Oracle home).
Very stable. Reboot time is what I would call normal (less than 1 minute). The databases are always available - never down.
So I guess I disagree with your assessment. The big machines (in my view) are the better machines for me.
Tom
From: Alex Gorbachev [mailto:gorbyx_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 3:42 PM
To: Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR)
Cc: MFontana_at_verio.net; roger_xu_at_dp7uptx.com; Oracle-L_at_Freelists. Org
(E-mail)
Subject: Re: two databases in a server
Hi Tom,
These are two extreme.
I would prefer in this case something in the middle - like 5 machines each hosting 6 DBs. Here you can flexibility to group them to get more convenient maintenance windows as well as limit system outage impact.
Cheers,
Alex
2006/3/30, oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org <oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org>:
Michael,
What you say is the reason the PC as database server revolution is
slowly dieing out. Many servers means many licenses. One large server
means one larger license. There is a significant cost savings.
And as you said, manageability. I would much rather manage 30 databases
on one server than thirty servers and thirty databases.
Separate Oracle Homes where needed, and we are in business!
Tom
-- Best regards, Alex Gorbachev -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Mar 31 2006 - 06:59:24 CST
![]() |
![]() |