RE: ZERO Database Downtime???

From: <oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:21:05 -0800
Message-ID: <5D2570CAFC98974F9B6A759D1C74BAD06FE5B2@ex2.ms.polyserve.com>

For a while they were saying that a Shared Oracle Home for RAC was a bad idea because "you can't do a rolling upgrade" with a single shared Oracle Home. Then people started calling them on the fact that you can't do a rolling upgrade AT ALL without Data Guard involvement...

marketing

>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
>>>[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Michael Fontana
>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 10:35 AM
>>>To: Jared Still; davidsharples_at_gmail.com
>>>Cc: Thomas.Mercadante_at_labor.state.ny.us; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
>>>Subject: RE: ZERO Database Downtime???
>>>
>>>Excuse me, but "little or no" is not the same as "Zero Downtime".
>>>
>>>A logical SQL apply is also not feasible in a large
>>>installation, or if there is complexity, such as RAC.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Wed Mar 29 2006 - 13:21:05 CST