RE: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)

From: Jesse, Rich <Rich.Jesse_at_qg.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:19:57 -0600
Message-ID: <FB5D3CCFCECC2948B5DCF4CABDBE6697545FE7@QTEX1.qg.com>

Ditto. The problem for me is coming up with a scheme to use all those cores simultaneously, or near to it. I'm using 9.2.0.7 on Solaris 10, since that's closest to our production.

Rich

	-----Original Message-----
	From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Michael McMullen
	Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 12:18 PM
	To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
	Subject: Re: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
	
	
	I'm doing this right now. 1 cpu 8 cores 4 threads per core.

Oracle sees it as 32 cpu. To me it looks like a big single point of failure. This is supposed to replace our E6500. I think the E6500 cost us close to a million bucks (including T3 misc hardware). What's the price of a T2000 a couple of grand. The decision on server was not mine to make.

Mike

Original Message ----- From: Vlad Sadilovskiy <mailto:vlovsky_at_gmail.com> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 12:32 PM Subject: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)

Hello,

We are currently evaluating hw replacement: Sun Fire 440 4 processors -> T2000 8 cores.

I'd appreciate if anybody could share his/her experience of moving DBs from Sun Fire 440 to T2000, or benchmark comparison for Oracle9i, 10g?

Thanks a ton.

Vladimir

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Mon Mar 27 2006 - 13:19:57 CST