Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Non Oracle UML question
Gints
This made me laugh but not in a nasty way. Well done for finding it!
I've never noticed a bug like this, I guess because I always do modelling in the schema owning account (which never has the DBA role). Schemester is not actively supported anymore, so I guess this is unlikely ever to get fixed.
Cheers, APC
-----Original Message-----
From: Gints Plivna [mailto:gints.plivna_at_gmail.com]
Sent: 27 February 2006 16:30
To: Clarke, Andrew
Cc: Lee.Robertson_at_acxiom.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Non Oracle UML question
Khe downloaded it and found an interesting bug immediately ;) I have many similar schemas with the same structure for testing purposes and they all can see each other because of DBA role.
So as a result for a table I got following FK constraint generation statement
ALTER TABLE CMIS_DB2.IRA_ADOPCIJAS
ADD CONSTRAINT FK_RADP_KAIM FOREIGN KEY
(RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_K
AIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,
RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KA
IM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,R
ADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAI
M_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RA
DP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM
_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RAD
P_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_
ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP
_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_I
D,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID,RADP_KAIM_ID)
REFERENCES
CMIS_DB4.KLS_AKT_IEMESLI(KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID ,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID ,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID ,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID ,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID ,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID ,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID ,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID,KAIM_ID)
But I only have 4 schemas (with identical constraint name) so the tool multiplies not only with 4 ;)))
Gints
2006/2/27, Clarke, Andrew <andrew.clarke_at_logicacmg.com>:
> It's not a UML tool but Schemester is free and a heck of a lot better
at
> modelling databases than Visio: http://www.schemester.co.uk/
>
> If you do have Vision already and you want to add UML capability Pavel
Hruby
> has free ones on his web site:
> http://www.phruby.com/index.html
>
> Cheers, APC
>
>
>
> A P Clarke
> Technical Consultant
> LogicaCMG UK Public Sector Division
> Stephenson House
> 75 Hampstead Road
> London
> UK
> NW1 2PL
> Direct Tel: +44 (0)207 446 4006
> Fax: +44 (0)207 446 1352
> Email: andrew.clarke_at_logicacmg.com
> ________________________________
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
> On Behalf Of Robertson Lee - lerobe
> Sent: 24 February 2006 09:59
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: Non Oracle UML question
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the non Oracle specific question but I was wondering what
you guys
> out there were using to build models (LDMs, PDMs etc.) ?
>
> I would prefer cheap or free tools if possible but any recommendations
would
> be great.
>
> TIA
>
> Lee
>
If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received
> this communication in error, please resend this
communication to the sender
> and delete the original message or any copy
of it from your computer
> system.
Thank
> You.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Mon Feb 27 2006 - 10:53:21 CST
![]() |
![]() |