Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents

I wasn't clear what he actually wants at first, how quickly, what for - he mumbled "checksum", "checksum" - that's why I said identical. Then when he saw it will take too much work he settled for num_rows.

On 2/22/06, Michael McMullen <ganstadba_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Wasn't the requirement "identical"?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ranko Mosic
> To: tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee
> Cc: ORACLE-L
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:54 PM
> Subject: Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
>
>
> Thanks to everybody guys, we can "close" this one.
> My boss settled for simple num_rows from dba_tables.
>
> Appreciate your time & effort.
> Ranko.
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
Regards,
Ranko Mosic
Contract Senior Oracle DBA
B. Eng, Oracle 10g, 9i Certified Database Professional
Phone: 416-450-2785
email: mosicr_at_rogers.com
http://ca.geocities.com/mosicr@rogers.com/ContractSeniorOracleDBARankoMosicMain.html

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l