Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: First 17 updated records disappeared from REDOLOG files
> left TPC for 6 months or so because of that. This feature disappeared
> after
> that and all was well in the harmonious family of relational databases.
> This
> "new feature" really raises my eyebrows.
I think IMU is different from discrete transactions. AFAIK DTs pinned the datablock until transaction ended, IMU doesn't. With IMU, normal read consistency mechanisms work ok.
Tanel.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Feb 22 2006 - 14:02:37 CST
![]() |
![]() |