Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: v$archived_log ==> applied=no
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 04:35:34PM -0800, GovindanK wrote:
> 434341; I wonder what could have caused the primary controlfile to
> think these two log files are not applied. I checked v$log_history ,
It is interesting that the data guard concepts guide refer to archive redo logs alternately as "standby redo log files."
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Sat Feb 04 2006 - 08:45:07 CST
![]() |
![]() |