Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: RE: stdby and Oracle licensing

Re: RE: stdby and Oracle licensing

From: Carel-Jan Engel <cjpengel.dbalert_at_xs4all.nl>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:38:37 +0100
Message-Id: <1138786717.5741.6.camel@dbalert199.dbalert.nl>


Mark,

Thank you for pointing out this. It's probably just that English isn't my first language that my wording isn't right and I didn't write what I intended to say.
I intended to focus on 'authorized', and I should have written 'person' in stead of 'sales rep'. (They're probably not authorized for anything anyway)

And yes, let's do it right.

Best regards,

Carel-Jan Engel

===
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok) ===

On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 16:33 -0700, MARK BRINSMEAD wrote:

> To be truly safe, your "special" licensing
> arrangements must be executed as a formal ammendment
> to the OLSA, and need to be signed by an authorised
> officer of Oracle Corp. (I.e., somebody authorised
> to offer/accept contracts on the part of Oracle
> Corp.) In my mind, that probably means a V.P. or
> better...
> I know, that's sort of "splitting hairs", but
> if you're gonna do it, you ought to do it right...
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Feb 01 2006 - 03:38:37 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US