Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Trace file does not list detailed timings
Is this a case of: 9i and
It used to show stats when I switched on SQL_TRACE, but it doesn't any more after an upgrade.
If so, then it's a change in default behaviour. In earlier versions of 9, when you enabled sql_trace, you implicitly enabled "_rowsource_execution_statistics". The most recent versions don't do this. If you want them, then
alter session set "_rowsource_execution_statistics"=true;
The cost is significant in some classes of query - nested loops seem to be the worst. I have an example where the CPU time goes up by a factor of three when stats are on.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/cbo_book/ind_book.html Cost Based Oracle: Fundamentals
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/appearances.html Public Appearances - schedule updated 10th Jan 2006
My trace file does not contain details...i.e.
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID OTAPA_REQUEST_QUEUE (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=91 us)
Instead shows
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID OTAPA_REQUEST_QUEUE What am I missing?
Jill Drocea
Oracle DBA
Verizon Wireless
845-365-7465
Jill.Drocea_at_verizonwireless.com
The information contained in this message and any attachment may be proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work product doctrine and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Jan 27 2006 - 16:42:56 CST
![]() |
![]() |