Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Oracle pricing changes
Just found this one on google - looks like a pretty good study:
http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/11/07/single/page13.html
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of dba1 mcc
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 3:42 PM
To: RROGERS_at_galottery.org; Oracle-L_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing changes
Anyone have document compare performance between dual-core and two CPU?
Thanks.
> List,
> Just got this email news about Oracle changing it's
> pricing on muti-core chip sets.
> Thought you might be interested. Our office is
> looking at the MS prices and now I have newer info
> on Oracle.
> News appeared at the right time as we are installing
> SQLServer and the duhmgt wants to convert Oracle to
> it.
>
>
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9597_22-6002050.html?tag=nl.e589
>
> Ron
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended solely for
> the individual or entity to which it is addressed
> and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination
> or other use of or taking action in reliance upon
> this information by persons or entities other than
> the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have
> received this email in error please contact the
> sender and delete the material from any computer.
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments \ hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email \ for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message \ that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither \ given nor endorsed by it. -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Dec 20 2005 - 23:58:22 CST
![]() |
![]() |