Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: SQL Server 2005 Review
Now I would not call that OT. In many cases it's dead on.
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Ethan Post
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:27 AM
To: ineyman_at_perceptron.com
Cc: jkstill_at_gmail.com; Oracle-L Freelists
Subject: Re: SQL Server 2005 Review
A little off topic here but I found this illustration of the software development life cycle to be pretty amusing.
http://openlexicon.org/xwiki/bin/view/lexicon/FAQ <http://openlexicon.org/xwiki/bin/view/lexicon/FAQ>
On 12/14/05, Igor Neyman <ineyman_at_perceptron.com> wrote:
Isn't it only natural, that complex systems are trying to get simpler, while simple systems are trying to get more complex, encroaching on each other territory?
Thanks Jared, good article.
Igor
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Dec 14 2005 - 11:00:46 CST
![]() |
![]() |