Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: export error for duh Gurus
Muh database too has been suffering from occasional similar failures.
Version 9.2.0.5. Solaris 8. HAve been asked by Oracle to upgrade to the
latest patchset, or to do conventional export, instead of direct. I decided
to live with the occassional error. Usually, once a month.
"Spears, Brian" <BSpears_at_Limitedbr To: <mark.powell_at_eds.com>, "oracle-l" <oracle-l_at_freelists.org> ands.com> cc: Sent by: Subject: RE: export error for duh Gurus oracle-l-bounce_at_fr eelists.org 12/13/2005 05:13 PM Please respond to BSpears
It's highly sensitive production db...
I cannot implement new datapump right now..It's just the nature of the environment here. Yes the conventional exports with direct=y ... If it wakes me up again, I will try the direct=N
Note: a rerun of the export usually is successful! So I am thinking some resource contention or something.
Brian
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
On Behalf Of Powell, Mark D
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 4:41 PM
To: oracle-l
Subject: RE: export error for duh Gurus
Brian, do you get the error on conventional exports? And to be clear I take it you are using the traditional exp utility and not the new expdp utility that is the preferred utility with 10g to use for exports.
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Spears, Brian Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 4:23 PM To: oracle-l Subject: export error for duh Gurus Has anyone got ideas or run across this intermittent export error? Randomly getting this error in the export full. Metalink does not show anything related at our version so a tar created. . . exporting table CARTON_STATUS EXP-00008: ORACLE error 8103 encountered ORA-08103: object no longer exists . . exporting table CLASS_IMPLEMENTATION 33 rows exported
* oracle 10.1.0.3.0 Hpux 11.23 32bit 9000/800
* The table exists
* The error occurs on different tables each time
* Check for block corruption shows no problems
* table creation date is months back
* normal processing in the database at this time
* consistent=y, direct=y full=y rows=y
Brian Spears From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Yongping Yao Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 1:22 AM To: sjaffarhussain_at_gmail.com Cc: oracle-l Subject: Re: pga_aggregate_target I think Expert Oracle: Database Arichitecture Chapter 3 (or 4 I don't have it in hand) will help you. On 12/13/05, The Human Fly <sjaffarhussain_at_gmail.com> wrote: Hello List, I was little confused about the settings of pga_aggregate_target parameter. I was in a assumption that when we set this parameter to a certain value, the usage of pga wont go beond this value. I have set pga as 3gb to one of my business critical database. Recently, I have found that max pga allocation was 4+ Gb. My boss askmed me, why the hell it takes more than what we have defined. I explained him saying that oracle might taken it from the OS to finish the necessary request. His immediately counter question was, then what is the use of setting pga_aggregate_target parameter? When oracle allocates and de-allocated the memory (pga) as per requirements. Is it expected behaviour that oracle takes sometime more that the value defined for pga? If so, what is the benift of setting value for pga? Thanks for your time. -- Best Regards, Syed Jaffar Hussain OCP 8i & 9i DBA, Banque Saudi Fransi, Saudi Arabia ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Winners don't do different things. They do things differently." -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- Yao Yongping Learning Oracle, UNIX/Linux... Love Reading, Classical Music, Philosophy, Economics etc. Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/yaoyp/
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Dec 13 2005 - 16:22:27 CST
![]() |
![]() |