Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: linux DBA's: O_Direct

RE: linux DBA's: O_Direct

From: Teehan, Mark <mark.teehan_at_csfb.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:16:34 +0800
Message-ID: <7EED3949F5157540B4B5307A7E9857040EB2EE@esng11p32002.csfb.cs-group.com>


Kevin -

Setting filesystemio_options=Direct does indeed prompt rman to do a direct write, but ext3 on 2.4.21 doesnt like it and blows up. o_direct support on ext3 seems to be flaky. There seems to be no overall redhat setting that says "Dont buffer filesystem I/o. At all. Ever" and you have to screw around with filesystems to try and turn it off; I havent suceeded in doing this. Backing up to OCFS is not supported afaik. Tell me: what happens to your free memory when you are running a backup - or any large IO accross an ext3 filesystem (a tar or even a tape backup..)

Thanks
mark

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Kevin Closson Sent: 23 November 2005 13:57
To: Oracle-L
Subject: RE: linux DBA's: O_Direct

>>>>I run database backups to an ext3 filesystem, using both
>>>rman and regular hotbackups on different servers. Linux uses
>>>all available ram to cache the writes to ext3, which can

If this is RMAN, why isn't oracle using O_DIRECT for the ext3 target?

10gR2 will do open(,O_DIRECT,) on ext3 if you set filesystemio_options=directIO.
I would recommend doing that, but then I'd also recommend a filesystem where you can put any thing you please in there - without the worry of landmines to step on...none of this "Uh, I think I'll put some goodies in ocfs filesystem, but then I have to put these other goodies in ext3 so my system doesn't blow up"

Kevin Closson
Chief Architect, Database Solutions
PolyServe
www.polyserve.com

>>>reduce free memory to 10-20MB (the box has 12GB) - this is
>>>how it is supposed to work. Sometimes the kernel is unable
>>>to allocate ram for new processes when it drop to this level
>>>and causes errors. It seems to me that filesystem block
>>>caching is unsuitable for a database server - it is not an
>>>issue for OCFS, only for backups to ext3.
>>>>
>>>>[...]
>>>>--
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>>>
>>>
>>>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l



==============================================================================
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: 

http://www.csfb.com/legal_terms/disclaimer_external_email.shtml

==============================================================================

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Nov 23 2005 - 00:19:26 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US