Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Database Connection Control
Isn't it better to try to limit a trace file size by MAX_DUMP_FILE_SIZE ?
Apart from wrong JDBC driver there are many other posibilities for an ugly application to flood Oracle. It's enough to generate a deadlock which generates a trace file(udump) and the file system will reach it's limits sooner or later.
Alternatively: delete older trace files by automated process if limits are close. It's ugly but still better than db stop.
-----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Michael Chan Sent: 15. nóvember 2005 08:30 To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Database Connection Control Hi All, I recently encountered the following bug with my Oracle 9.2.0.6 production database. Bug 1725012 -- ORA-600 [TTCGCSHND-1] CONNECTING FROM 817 CLIENT TO 9I USING THIN DRIVER (JDBC) One of an inactive client, installed with 8i JDBC thin driver, wake up at one time and tried to connect to the production database. Unfortunately, the connection triggered the bug and Oracle just output trace files continuously (2 files per second, 10M each) and the database finally crashed when the file system was full. I'm wondering if I can control database access from server side, such that - if the client is installed with software with version that are not supported, they are prohitibied from accessing the database. Any inputs or thoughts will be appreciated. Thanks, Michael
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Nov 15 2005 - 05:07:22 CST
![]() |
![]() |