RE: logical standby using different os

Don't worry, you're absolutely right. Same OS, and for Oracle, same version. Some exceptions (for one-off patches) for the patch-level apply, for the so called (but not really) rolling upgrades,

Best regards,

Carel-Jan Engel

===
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok) ===
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 03:48 +1100, Pete Sharman wrote:

> As far as I can recall, it does require the same OS, for the very reason you mention. But I'm sure Carel-Jan will leap down my throat if I'm wrong. :)
>
>
> Pete
>
> "Controlling developers is like herding cats."
> Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook
>
> "Oh no, it's not. It's much harder than that!"
> Bruce Pihlamae, long-term Oracle DBA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Adams, Matthew (GE Consumer & Industrial)
> Sent: Thursday, 3 November 2005 4:24 AM
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: logical standby using different os
>
> The basic questions is: Does a dataguard logical standby have to be on the same OS as the primary?
>
> Off hand I was thinking, yes is probably does. The standby has to be able to read archive logs generated on the primary. Is the format of those logs dependent upon the OS involved? I thought it was, therefore, I thought the OS had to be the same (as well as the version of the DB).
>
> However, I had somebody tell me that they were sure that one reason oracle created logical standbys was so that you could do this across different OSes.
>
> A somewhat preliminary search of the Dataguard concepts manual and Metalink has not provided a definative answer either way.
>
> Thanks
> Matt
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l