Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: strange behavior - DBMS_FEATURE_USAGE_INTERNAL
Is a 10g thing...interesting.
http://www.psoug.org/reference/builtin_packages.html http://www.psoug.org/reference/dbms_feature_usage.html http://www.psoug.org/reference/dbms_feature_usage_rpt.html
Oracle Built-in Packages Version 10.1
Common Name
Usage Registration & Monitoring
Usage Registration Internal: Undocumented
Usage Report
Owner
SYS
Package Name
DBMS_FEATURE_USAGE DBMS_FEATURE_USAGE_INTERNAL DBMS_FEATURE_USAGE_REPORT
Last Modified
14-Sep-2005
-
14-Sep-2005
SELECT name, description FROM dba_feature_usage_statistics;
[oracle_at_www admin]$ more /u01/oracle/product/10.1.0/rdbms/admin/prvtfus.plb
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY dbms_feature_usage wrapped
a000000
1
...
[oracle_at_www admin]$ more /u01/oracle/product/10.1.0/rdbms/admin/dbmsfus.sql
Rem
Rem $Header: dbmsfus.sql 25-apr-2003.18:49:06 aime Exp $
Rem
Rem dbmsfus.sql
Rem
Rem Copyright (c) 2002, 2003, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Rem
Rem NAME
Rem dbmsfus.sql - User Interface for the DB Feature Rem Usage PL/SQL interfacesRem
Chris Marquez
Oracle DBA
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org on behalf of Paul Drake
Sent: Wed 10/26/2005 6:03 PM
To: oracle list
Subject: strange behavior - DBMS_FEATURE_USAGE_INTERNAL
After a database had been cloned, I noticed that one tempfile had not
been added.
As a result of the missing tempfile, numerous trace files were
produced in the usual location.
I'm not saying that its a good idea to have such a database with the sys account assigned to a temporary tablespace that is empty ... as that might be a violation of the digital millenium copyright act.
I just found it funny that they couldn't write their snooper code to work without a sort segment. :)
-bdbafh
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Oct 26 2005 - 18:00:53 CDT
![]() |
![]() |