On 10/18/05, Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR) <
Thomas.Mercadante_at_labor.state.ny.us> wrote:
>
> It is a strange article. It started out rather fairly comparing the two
> databases – how they are similar and how they are different. When the
> article hit "backups", it completely skipped describing Oracle backups –
> like the author either didn't know or just got tired.
>
> I wonder who this was written for?
>
Oh, its written for folk moving from Oracle to Sqlserver. This is why it
doesn't compare any of the hard stuff to move like PL/SQL vs T-SQL and so
on. I'm sure Oracle has equally dodgy comparisons available as well.
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Oct 18 2005 - 10:35:40 CDT
