Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Bitmap Index
w.r.t
"In your case, i'd definitely say your data has low enough cardinality to
warrant a bitmap index."
I don't have the details to hand, but I've seen and replicated benchmarks that show for querying data, then even up to cardinality of n/2 (n=table rows), then bitmap index outperformed a b-tree index.
Its typically not cardinality that matters - the real benefit of bitmaps comes when you can combine them, or you can scan them *instead* of the table to get data (because they're typically so much smaller). Its this versus the concurrency limitations that you need decide on
hth
-- Connor McDonald =========================== email: connor_mcdonald_at_yahoo.com web: http://www.oracledba.co.ukReceived on Wed Oct 12 2005 - 17:04:10 CDT
"Semper in excremento, sole profundum qui variat"
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
![]() |
![]() |